> On 5 Jan 2015, at 18:34, Antonio Ceballos <acebal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is only a rough plan, but one of the things that I have in mind is > to allow users provide their own evaluation function as an Scheme > expression. That would be possible when GNU Chess is run in a > especial new mode whereby the Guile evaluation function would replace > the built-in evaluation function. > > For that purpose, I think that I need both to embed Guile into Chess, > and to export some primitives that could be used as building blocks > for the Scheme evaluation function. > > Does it make sense? I couple a years ago, I wrote a Guile C++ wrap with a small Flex/Bison parser, with infix syntax, which perhaps can be an input. I have updated it, so it compiles using Clang in C++11 mode. One can type an infix expression and see what Scheme code it translates to, and also evaluate it. 1. https://secure2.storegate.com/Shares/Home.aspx?ShareID=e195dec2-1c1a-42a1-851e-da47e674d91b
