Ahh, I thought we nuked the unhygienic macros in our tool-chain, That is a
BUG!
Anyway can I suggest a Bug report where we
1) Make the unhygienic define-macros in the following files hygienic,
-------------------------------------------------
module/srfi/srfi-4.scm:
module/srfi/srfi-69.scm:
module/srfi/srfi-4/gnu.scm:
module/system/base/syntax.scm:
module/system/base/language.scm:
module/system/base/lalr.upstream.scm:
module/statprof.scm:
module/oop/goops.scm:
module/oop/goops/save.scm:
module/oop/goops/accessors.scm:
module/texinfo/plain-text.scm:
module/ice-9/i18n.scm:
module/ice-9/time.scm:
module/ice-9/serialize.scm:
module/ice-9/session.scm:
module/ice-9/optargs.scm:
module/scripts/snarf-check-and-output-texi.scm:
module/scripts/lint.scm:
module/sxml/ssax/input-parse.scm:
module/sxml/transform.scm:
module/sxml/upstream/SXPath-old.scm:
module/sxml/upstream/SSAX.scm:;
module/language/tree-il/primitives.scm:
module/language/ecmascript/base.scm:
module/language/assembly/disassemble.scm:
module/rnrs/bytevectors.scm:
And also change the defmacro forms in,
---------------------------------------------------------
module/system/base/lalr.scm:
module/texinfo/reflection.scm:
module/ice-9/and-let-star.scm:
module/ice-9/calling.scm:
module/ice-9/expect.scm:
module/ice-9/optargs.scm:
module/scripts/generate-autoload.scm:
module/scripts/generate-autoload.scm:
/Stefan
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Ian Price <ianpric...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> Stefan Israelsson Tampe <stefan.ita...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > (use-modules (srfi srfi-2))
> > (use-modules (srfi srfi-1))
> >
> > (define-curried (string-matches pattern string)
> > (and-let* ((match-struct (string-match pattern string))
> > (count (match:count match-struct)))
> > (map (lambda(n)(match:substring match-struct n))
> > (iota (1- count) 1))))
> >
> > scheme@(guile-user)> (string-matches "([a-z])" "a")
> > $4 = ("a")
> >
> >
> > ,exp ((string-matches "([a-z])") "a")
> > $5 = ((lambda (string-871)
> > (let ((match-struct-876
> > (string-match "([a-z])" string)))
> > (if match-struct-876
> > (let ((count-880 (match:count match-struct-876)))
> > (if count-880
> > (map (lambda (n-883)
> > (match:substring match-struct-876 n-883))
> > (iota (#{1-}# count-880) 1))
> > #f))
> > #f)))
> > "a")
> >
> > And we see that string is not managed correctly. Is this a bug? I
> > can't understand why this is not treated as intended!
>
> The problem is one that occurs when hygienic and non-hygienic macros are
> mixed. Here, and-let* is the non-hygienic one. Basically, in a hygienic
> macro, you carry around a bunch of context to allow you to refer to the
> right variable names. Then defmacro comes along, strips all that away,
> and uses the raw symbol names.
>
> We can fix and-let* to be hygienic, that's pretty easy, but I'm not sure
> what you can do about this in general. It's not like you can pass in the
> gensymed name, because that will break the way people who for some
> reason still right defmacros expect them to work.
>
> Dunno, maybe I'm just missing some insight here.
>
> --
> Ian Price -- shift-reset.com
>
> "Programming is like pinball. The reward for doing it well is
> the opportunity to do it again" - from "The Wizardy Compiled"
>
