On 08/20/2013 12:39 PM, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> It seems following is invalid:
>
> (let ((a 2))
> (define (foo x) (+ a x)))
>
> I prefer to reduce scope of variable as much as possible, so
> I find this restriction unconvinent. Is is part of standard or technical
> limitation? Is it any workaround?
use a lambda form rather than a define:
(letrec ((a 2)
(foo (lambda (x) (+ a x))))
(foo 3))
>
> Please, keep in CC, I am not subscribed.
>
> --
> Best regards, Dmitry Bogatov <kact...@gnu.org>,
> Free Software supporter and netiquette guardian.
> git clone git://kaction.name/rc-files.git --depth 1
> GPG: 54B7F00D
> Html mail and proprietary format attachments are forwarded to /dev/null.
