() l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) () Thu, 15 Aug 2013 17:51:39 +0200 I think it would be great to submit it for inclusion in GDBM itself, as an optional feature. [...] because the GDBM API is stable.
I agree that the GDBM API is stable. However...
WDYT?
Guile-GDBM takes moderate pains to handle various Guile versions (in
addition to various GDBM versions). I would not wish to impose this
hair (including ttn-style issues) on the GDBM hacker just yet.
OTOH, everything here is Free Software, so i'd be delighted to find
Guile-GDBM obsoleted by inclusion (of the hair) in some future GDBM
release. (The job is feasible, if Someone (not me) is motivated.)
--
Thien-Thi Nguyen
GPG key: 4C807502
(if you're human and you know it)
read my lisp: (responsep (questions 'technical)
(not (via 'mailing-list)))
=> nil
pgpBhuX5TACMa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
