> From: Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> > Cc: Eli Zaretskii <e...@gnu.org>, guile-user@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2013 23:16:18 +0200 > > On Sun 09 Jun 2013 22:33, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > > > However, that warning doesn’t take into account the signal thread, nor > > the GC thread (if any). So, although that seems unlikely, there could > > still be issues, for instance if the ‘scm_fork’ call happens while > > ‘signal_delivery_thread_mutex’ is locked. > > In theory the signal thread is counted among the threads -- iirc anyway. > The signal-handling thread is kicked off at the first call to sigaction, > which shouldn't happen there, right?
Windows doesn't have sigaction.
