"." <nkw...@gmail.com> writes: > Hi, > > Why do we need substring [1]? We already have string-copy which looks > similar to me. > (These functions take different number of arguments, but string-copy > can handle this because it's more generic.) > > Is this connected with compatability, convenience or something else? substring is in the standard, has been for ages.
-- Ian Price -- shift-reset.com "Programming is like pinball. The reward for doing it well is the opportunity to do it again" - from "The Wizardy Compiled"
