On Jan 10, 2012, at 13:22, Daniel Llorens wrote:

> On Jan 9, 2012, at 18:11, Andy Wingo wrote:
> 
>> Ew.  Why don't we instead allocate a typecode for arrays.  I just pushed
>> a patch to do that, and for bitvectors as well.  Copying Daniel Llorens,
>> to check that I didn't break arrays.
> 
> I've just tested g3248c95 and I see no breakage.


Hm, maybe not so. I've filed 
http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=10482. I think it maybe related to 
this, but I haven't tested before the patch.

Regards,

        Daniel

Reply via email to