On Mon 19 Dec 2011 08:56, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> writes: >> Would you like to submit a patch to document your findings? :-) > > As long as Guile as a project is dead enough to require passersby not > just to report but also fix its problems and organize the infrastructure > for it, it does not seem like something one could recommend to depend on > in good conscience.
David, you are not a passer-by: you hack on a GNU project that has been using Guile for some 15 years now. You know Scheme. You like GNU, I presume. You have spent paragraphs and countless electrons about these two or three bugs, on the development lists, using them as a meta-token of all that you perceive to be wrong with a project: but you never filed a bug report. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel/13001 As my dear grandmother used to say, "shit or get off the pot": either submit a patch or file a bug report. Discussing Guile in GNU is totally on-topic, but using these two easily fixed bugs to smear the work we have been doing for the last few years is not productive. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
