It's getting pretty annoying that char-set-contains? rejects #<eof>. Is there a way around this without wrapping it myself? Is that behavior intended? Because to me, it seems like it'd be more reasonable to return #f when passed #<eof>.
- char-set-contains? and #<eof> No Itisnt
- Re: char-set-contains? and #<eof> Ludovic Courtès
- Re: char-set-contains? and #<eof> No Itisnt
- Re: char-set-contains? and #<eof> Andy Wingo
