Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> How to achieve this effect without using eval? >> (I've tried (+ . l) but it didn't work out) > > (apply + l)
Correct :) Here comes another one: Suppose I want to define a variable, but I don't know its name -- it is contained in another variable. For example: (define a 'b) I want to assign a value to the symbol "contained" in a. (that would be b in this example). The problem is that "define" quotes its first argument. How to achieve it? >> Yeah, I always write additional layers so the code corresponds to the >> way I think. (Everybody does, don't they?) > > Yes! '(:-)
