Hi, Roland Orre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If the GC should be replaced I would consider it wise to > replace it with an algorithm than can be run in a thread. HBGC can be configured with `--enable-parallel-mark'. The `GC_MARKERS' environment variable then sets the number of marker threads. > Regarding GC I also think it is could be useful to have a GC that > can compact the memory and of course give allocated memory back to > the OS when no longer needed. HBGC doesn't compact memory and does not either give unused memory back to the OS (current GC doesn't either). Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
