William Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > So all other things are blocked during accept()?
Signals for the thread in question at least :(. > Maybe this is a problem of scheme accept? It's not a good thing, though fixing it might be tricky. Do you actually need to know immediately the child exits? Perhaps it's enough to reap on the next connection. If you need to know then you might keep a pipe open to each child, then `select' on them plus the listening port. Whichever has some action (incoming connect or exited child) can show up. _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user