Daniel Llorens del Río <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Absolutely, that's what I mean. Actually, maybe I'd prefer up-arrow to > show > > guile> (define (foo) > ... (bar)) > > just as I would have typed it. But that's a minor detail.
I suspect readline can't display like that. > The idea is, I guess, to have readline split its history not by > newlines but by matching parentheses at the top level, at least when > they cross line boundaries. I'll look into that, thanks. The notion of input continuation is there, but at the moment add-history is used for each line. It ought to be just a matter of holding lines until the start of the next continuation. I'd think that could be just changed (don't bother with an option for the current behaviour). bash works multi-line this way for instance. _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
