Hi, Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> All looks fine to me, except one thing. I don't think we gain anything by > exporting the struct-equal?/scm_struct_equalp API, so I'd prefer to > have this as an internal (scm_i_) function and not exported to > Scheme. (Cf. the fact that there isn't any list-equal? in Scheme.) I'd rather think about it the other way round: there's no compelling reason to hide it, and actually both R5RS and Guile already define a number of type-specific equality predicates which allow users to directly use them rather than `equal?' (with a potential performance gain). What was the reason to not have `list-equal?'? Was it the fact that we want it to be inlined within `equal?'? Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
