Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > William Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> While this is a function? It seems the very variable is >> *readline-completion-function*, but which is not exported from the >> module? > > Yes. I guess the point is to protect the normal value of > *readline-completion-function* from being permanently lost. Is this > interface a problem in practice for you?
Hmm, not really. I think i'm okay with it at present. >> Also, i have no clue how to contruct a proper `completer' for >> with-readline-completion-function. The docstring is too simple... > > It is a bit odd, but basically follows the corresponding C interface. > Here's an example which worked some time ago for me. (I haven't > tested it recently.) > [...] That works. Thanks. And i thought maybe this function can be included in readline module. It is very useful. -- William _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
