Ken Raeburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ... except for the little detail that ISO C says a string literal has > type "char [N]", not "const char [N]". So, probably no warning in > this case.
Indeed! One never stops learning C... ;-) Still removing `const' makes sense in the general case, don't you think so? Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
