Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hi,
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Or are you thinking of a "redefinition" as something different to what
I'm thinking? The case I'm thinking of is where a file contains a
definition, and you load that file twice (perhaps via use-modules, but
that's not important).
What I'm thinking of is something as simple as:
(define x 2)
(define x "hello")
This is also what happens when a file is loaded twice.
What about an `eval-enable' option?
Sorry, but either you're not reading my emails properly, or I am
misunderstanding you (or else my own rule).
What I have proposed is a rule that means that Guile would NOT give a
warning in such cases. Isn't that what you want?
Neil
_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
