Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > FWIW, I agree. In 1.7.x I believe we have more of the infrastructure > in place to get this right - by which I mean to signal an error if a > macro is passed in this way. But (having just tried your tests out on > 1.7.x) it's not doing this just yet.
I haven't considered it carefully yet, but if fold's only supposed to take a procedure for kons, then why not just add a check-arg-type procedure? call for kons? -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
