Mike Gran <spk...@yahoo.com> writes: > bootstrapped with the bitrotten guts of what we had before to get back > to a working `make check`. From here, it might be simple to extract > the old 64-bit patch and incorporate the Lilypond patch set in whole or > in part. I don't know yet. I haven't tried it. … > - rlb expressed the importance of ensuring the ABI on Debian versions of > Guile don't change with minor revisions, so I think he'd like to see … > - janneke indicated that in the past, the *.go files were identical for … > - the Guix project does cross-build MinGW packages on their CI/CD, so … > - and spk121 (me) wants Guile to be buildable using the native tools of > Cygwin and MSYS2's MINGW32 and UCRT64 toolchains … > there. Just a bit more time. But if another Guile committer wants to > champion the Lilypond patchset and push it, that's fine by me. No need > to wait on me.
I wish I could champion it, but as I can’t (I have no Windows skills or experience to speak of), I’d just like to ask whether there was progress off-list. Also: thank you for championing the inclusion of the patchset! Best wishes, Arne -- Unpolitisch sein heißt politisch sein, ohne es zu merken. draketo.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
