Hi Tomas, Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> writes:
[...] > While the built-in ,d in the REPL does not process the Texinfo, some > third party tools do. For example geiser-doc-symbol-at-point. I think > we should modify the ,d to support it as well. Ah, I've been using Geiser all along and had not noticed it was doing that, neat! > In my personal library, I wrote a script[0] to extract the documentation > strings into the manual[1]. Nice! > So in my experience having the Texinfo in docstrings is nice. Only > gripe I have with it is that (texinfo) module is bit limited, and > rejects a lot (for some value of "lot" :)) of valid texinfo. That can always be rectified :-). > 0: https://git.wolfsden.cz/guile-wolfsden/tree/build-aux/doc-snarf.scm > 1: > https://files.wolfsden.cz/manuals/guile-wolfsden/guile-wolfsden-0.0.7.html#Auto_002dgenerated-documentation Thanks for the share! -- Thanks, Maxim
