Rob Browning <r...@defaultvalue.org> writes: > Offhand, the failure doesn't look quite the same, but think it's worth > checking.
I tried it on perotto with most of the debian/patches, and it passes all the tests except for one odd failure in r4rs.test, which I think is new? i.e. the original 32-bit problem is fixed, and the existing debian 32-bit big-endian patch fixed the segfault. r4rs.test crashes with a ttyname ENODEV while apparently trying to print a backtrace, so I don't know exactly what's wrong "underneath" yet. (Offhand, I wondered if the ENODEV might be (s)chroot-related somehow.) -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
