Hi Arne, "Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" <arne_...@web.de> skribis:
> From 81e7cbbade4fd01e092a2c39a3af90e4abf7f684 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_...@web.de> > Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 06:34:52 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] Add language/wisp, Wisp tests, and SRFI-119 documentation > > * doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi (srfi-119): add node > * module/language/wisp.scm: New file. > * module/language/wisp/spec.scm: New file. > * test-suite/tests/srfi-119.test: New file. I have the pleasure to inform you that I have finally pushed this! :-) Apologies for taking so long, and thank you for being patient. Some of the suggestions I made earlier¹ were still not implemented though: 1. Using uninterned symbols rather than UUIDs. 2. Using a record type for lines instead of tuples. 3. Avoiding source properties. I took the liberty to implement #1 in commit 27feb2bfd38087cf03989673da0fc74ed795307d. Tests pass but please let me know if you notice something wrong! It’d be great if you could look at #2 and #3 along the lines of what I suggested earlier. This time we should be able to move forward more quickly. :-) Thanks! Ludo’. ¹ https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2023-08/msg00009.html
