Hi Ludo, Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> writes:
> Jonas Hahnfeld via "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility > library" <guile-devel@gnu.org> skribis: > >> From b5f1013ad969b6e4e35b36dc63798375ffbecda3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Jonas Hahnfeld <hah...@hahnjo.de> >> Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 12:47:21 +0200 >> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Fix loading of custom-ports extension >> >> * module/ice-9/custom-ports.scm: Load extension also in expand and eval. > >> From 78c97b8a49ba336516e954c6c62e4baa7f429f47 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Jonas Hahnfeld <hah...@hahnjo.de> >> Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 19:24:22 +0200 >> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Match on correct argument in make-custom-port >> >> * module/ice-9/custom-ports.scm (make-custom-port): Match on correct >> argument for conversion strategy. > > Applied both, thanks! > > Ludo'. > > PS: As far as I’m concerned, patches sent to bug-gu...@gnu.org are less > likely to be lost because I see them in M-x debbugs. > The contributing documentation mention to send patches to guile-devel at gnu dot org; should this guidance be changed? >From the HACKING file: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- - If you have put together a change that meets the coding standards described below, we encourage you to submit it to Guile. Post your patch to guile-devel@gnu.org. --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- -- Thanks, Maxim
