On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 5:40 AM Jonas Hahnfeld via Developers list for
Guile, the GNU extensibility library <guile-devel@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2023-11-28 at 22:04 +0100, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> >
> > Ping, any comments on this approach? I built binaries for LilyPond
> > 2.25.10 using these patches applied on top of Guile 3.0.9 and the
> > result seems to work fine on Windows.
>
> Another ping; meanwhile we switched to building the official binaries
> of LilyPond with Guile 3.0 starting from version 2.25.11, but it would
> be really great to get rid of our downstream patches...

Just chiming in to say this is a very exciting development that I had
missed when the patch set was first sent!

Does this allow a fully featured Guile build or are some things still
disabled? Does JIT work?

Hopefully Ludo or Andy can spare some time to review soon!

- Dave

  • Re: Guile 64-bit ... Maxime Devos
  • Re: Guile 64-bit ... Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library
    • Re: Guile 64... Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library
      • Re: Guil... Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
      • Re: Guil... Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library
        • Re: ... Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
        • Re: ... Thompson, David
          • ... Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library
            • ... Thompson, David
              • ... Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library
              • ... Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library
              • ... Thompson, David
              • ... Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library
              • ... Thompson, David
              • ... Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library
              • ... Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
              • ... Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library

Reply via email to