> A benefit of SRFI-64 is that the SRFI-64 implementation has tests > whereas (IIRC) Guile's custom thing doesn't.
OK two separate issues. 1. Mike G's gripes about SRFI-64. 2. Updating over 65,000 lines of test code I don't want to be put in the position of having to make a critique of SRFI-64, and, once my critique is dissected, make it appear that that is justification for updating the test suite. I wouldn't be the decision maker, anyway. It is 2 MB of test code that has served Guile well so far. I think the argument for srfi-64 is not self-evident. That srfi-64 is familiar to some and has a test suite does not prove that the current test suite is difficult for newcomers to understand and is buggy. Respectfully, -Mike
