Hi, Maxime Devos <maximede...@telenet.be> skribis:
> For complicated macros, especially macros that are used correctly but > have a bug in their implementation somewhere and use 'syntax-case' > or 'syntax-rules' multiple times, it can be very convenient to know > _which_ syntax-case or syntax-rules raised the syntax-error. > > E.g., I'm currently debugging some changes to a (non-Guile) macro, > and I don't know what to make of the following -- the '#:getter . datum-type' > isn't even present in the original code anywhere: > > ice-9/boot-9.scm:1685:16: In procedure raise-exception: > Syntax error: > unknown location: source expression failed to match any pattern in form > (#:getter . datum-type) > make: *** [Makefile:1333: gnu/gnunet/dht/client.go] Fout 1 > > As such, partially revert the following commit that does not give a > rationale on how backtraces for syntax errors aren't helpful. Do you have a simple reproducer and a before/after comparison showing what Guile prints? Thanks, Ludo’.
