> On 25 Nov 2021, at 19:22, Maxime Devos <maximede...@telenet.be> wrote:
>
> lloda schreef op do 25-11-2021 om 17:40 [+0100]:
>> +Arrays with empty roots are not considered immutable because
>> +@code{array-set!} operations with valid indices won't fail (since
>> there
>> +are no valid indices).
>> +
>> +@example
>> +(array-mutable? #()) @result{} #t
>> +@end example
>> +@end deffn
>
> By this logic, shouldn't empty subarrays (*) with a possibly mutable
> and non-empty root be considered mutable as well?
>
> (*) called ‘shared arrays’ in the manual
>
> Greetings,
> Maxime
That would make sense, I think.
The test in the patch is the same one that is used to validate
array_handle_xxx_writable_elements(), which looks only at the root and not at
the array dimensions. Those two tests should be the same, so I'll have to
change the test in array_handle_xxx_writable_elements().
Thanks
Daniel
