I can confirm that this patch solves the issue On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 11:33 AM Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> wrote:
> On Wed 08 Jan 2020 15:22, Nala Ginrut <nalagin...@gmail.com> writes: > > > In unknown file: > > 4 (primitive-load-path "artanis/server/server-context" #<…>) > > In ice-9/eval.scm: > > 626:19 3 (_ #<directory (artanis server server-context) 5624d6b3…>) > > 155:9 2 (_ #<directory (artanis server server-context) 5624d6b3…>) > > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > > 1153:19 1 (_ _ _ _ _ _ _) > > 1655:16 0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _) > > > > ice-9/boot-9.scm:1655:16: In procedure raise-exception: > > Wrong number of arguments to #<procedure 5624d66ee4a0 at > ice-9/boot-9.scm:1153:19 (a b c d e f)> > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Any hint that I can figure out whait's incompatible? > > Gosh we need to improve this info. Anyway the procedure at > boot-9.scm:1153:19 is a record constructor, for a record with 6 fields. > Apparently somewhere in (artanis server server-context) is calling it > with the wrong number of arguments. What do you use for records? Do > you have your own abstraction or do you use R6RS records or something? > Perhaps something in artanis relied on the way that R6RS records used to > implement single inheritance, as a chain of objects instead of a flat > record. Or perhaps the adaptations to R6RS records in Guile introduced > a bug. I am interested to know the answer :) > > Andy > >
