> On Nov 24, 2017, at 3:42 PM, Christopher Allan Webber > <cweb...@dustycloud.org> wrote: > > Matt Wette writes: > >> Here are a couple desires: >> >> 1) more cases for cond-expand, in case 3.2 has items 3.0 does not (e.g., >> srfi-199) >> >> 2) better debugging. >> Maybe I'm not doing it right, but I struggle in this area: I mostly resort >> to printing. >> For example, add scheme level hook, or command arg, to turn off >> optimization. > > You aren't alone... read this thread: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-user/2017-05/msg00068.html > > And Andy's suggestion of what we need to do to make it better: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-user/2017-05/msg00070.html
(set! (@@ (language tree-il optimize) tree-il-default-optimization-options) (lambda () '())) and maybe this also? (set! (@@ (language cps optimize) cps-default-optimization-options) (lambda () '()))
