Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> writes:
> This is expected. The macro, like that of SRFI-9, creates one binding
> for the record-type descriptor, one for the constructor, one for the
> predicate, and one for the accessor. Since the first two have the
> same name, it Doesn’t Work.
OK, so I just wasn't paying close enough attention.
If I really do want to have <foo> for the goops class, and don't want to
patch things up afterward, I could also just rename the default
constructor, i.e.:
(use-modules (srfi srfi-9 gnu))
(use-modules (oop goops))
(define-immutable-record-type foo
(make-foo x)
foo?
(x x))
(display foo) (newline)
(display <foo>) (newline)
Whether or not that's a good idea is of course a different question...
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
