Nala Ginrut <nalagin...@gmail.com> writes:

> On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 22:27 +0100, Mathieu Lirzin wrote:
>> Also you have removed “Ragnarok”.  if it is related to this change can
>> you explain it in the commit log otherwise please do a separate patch.
>> 
>
> Now that Luis has updated to add Artanis to libraries, I think I don't
> have to send the patch twice. ;-)
> Anyway, I could explain it here. Ragnarok as a generic server is
> obsolete now, it'll be replaced by Artanis as a monolithic framework
> with a strong server core (this will happen in v0.2+).

Thanks for your explanation.  In fact Luis has only append Artanis
without removing Ragnarok, so here is the updated patch to remove the
Ragnarok entry.

>From 8df2c33eff51eb74cae4f4324eece56a8be283fc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mathieu Lirzin <m...@gnu.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 21:04:55 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] libraries: Remove Ragnarok.

* website/apps/base/libraries-page.scm (libraries-page): Remove Ragnarok
  which has been declared obsolete by its author.

Suggested-by: Nala Ginrut <mu...@gnu.org>
---
 website/apps/base/libraries-page.scm | 8 --------
 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/website/apps/base/libraries-page.scm b/website/apps/base/libraries-page.scm
index b2a4775..320b17b 100644
--- a/website/apps/base/libraries-page.scm
+++ b/website/apps/base/libraries-page.scm
@@ -208,14 +208,6 @@
 	    "parsing user-supplied style information and for querying the "
 	    "resulting cascade using SXML/SDOM documents or plain text.")
 	 (p (b "License: ") "GPL"))
-	(section
-	 (@ (class "lib"))
-	 (h3 (a (@ (href "http://gitorious.org/glow/ragnarok/";))
-		"Ragnarok"))
-	 (p (span (@ (class "guile-version-tag")) "Guile 2.0"))
-	 (p "A server for HTTP and other Internet protocols, with support "
-	    "for templates, CGI, and more.")
-	 (p (b "License: ") "LGPL 3 or later"))
 	(h2 (@ (id "tools")) "Tools")
 	(p "These projects are tools for or implemented with Guile. Mostly, "
 	   "these are the types of things that automate documentation or "
-- 
2.6.2

Since you are the author of Ragnarok, I would suggest to add in the
README file a statement that Ragnarok is obsolete/unmaintained.

Thanks,

--
Mathieu Lirzin

Reply via email to