Thorsten Wilms <t...@freenet.de> writes: > I guess the silence (with the one exception, thank you Amirouche!) > means I should stop and go away, [...]
No need to be so self-critical. :-) Personally I was silent because I found both nice in their own ways and could not decide. (Your second logo is definitely much nicer than your first though, IMO.) In the mail you originally posted, the logo it looked somewhat pixelated (needs more anti-aliasing?) but in this on-website comparison it doesn't have that issue so it looks very nice. And I have to say it looks almost like a somewhat better fit on the website, due to the rest of the site looking quite "organic" (due to the drawing, I think), and your logo too (due to the curvature of the lambda, I think), whereas the other logo looks a bit more "mechanic" and more bold (literally as well as figuratively). Not sure if my words make sense, describing feelings is difficult. All in all I find both very nice, but have a slight preference for your logo, at least when placed on the website. Taylan
