Nala Ginrut <nalagin...@gmail.com> skribis: > So here's my problem, there's only one reader slot defined in each > language type ,say, in (system base language). I have to implement just > one reader to fit them all: > 1. If I provide the interactive reader in Guile, the reader becomes > inefficient. Because each time users input `Enter', the source code > typed so far will be detected in lalr-parser, and exception would be > caught when the line doesn't complete a chunk, then the REPL returns > continue prompt, say '...'. > > 2. If I provide compiler reader, people have to type semicolon or ctrl+d > to see the result.
Commit 65fa60 adjusted the REPL for multi-language support. In particular that works fine with both Scheme/elisp and ECMAScript. What exactly is missing for Lua to be usable at the REPL? Ludo’.
