taylanbayi...@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bayırlı/Kammer") skribis:
> Has it been considered to coalesce the box type with Guile's "variable" > type? I can see two concrete differences: > > * External representation (*not* specified by SRFI-111) > > * Variables can be "unbound" (empty), boxes can't > > So we could get away with making the box API consist of aliases to a > subset of the variable API and still conform to SRFI-111. Even though both types are box-like, they represent conceptually different things, so I think it’s better to keep them disjoint. Ludo’.
