Mark H Weaver <m...@netris.org> skribis: > "Thompson, David" <dthomps...@worcester.edu> writes: > >> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> wrote: >>> I think it would make sense to implement them in Scheme, say in >>> ice-9/hash-table.scm, which could be either a separate module or a file >>> included from boot-9.scm. >>> >>> WDYT? >> >> Does anyone else feel that this is a better approach? > > FWIW, I think Ludovic is right. There's no compelling reason to write > these procedures in C, and it would be good to reduce the amount of C > code for several reasons. However, unlike ttn, I think it would be good > to have these procedures in core Guile.
Agreed. David: would you be willing to do that? Apologies for my late comment, and for the extra work involved. Your contributions are appreciated! Thanks, Ludo’.
