On Wed 22 May 2013 22:39, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Looks good. Would be nice to mention variable names too.
Will do. > It seems elf.scm would benefit from byte structures similar to those > announced by Taylan on guile-user. That’s more for aesthetics though, > and definitely not blocking. Yes, but it's tricky. On-disk you can be 32-bit or 64-bit, and with differing endiannesses. Makes it tricky to read. And on the writing side you have the same, but also that you usually start from Scheme data instead of bytevectors. I'm sure there is some useful abstraction lurking there, but I haven't found it yet. > Docstrings are lacking in those files. Will fix. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
