Hello! This is all very exciting!
Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> skribis: > However, I think we've done all we can in branches. I think we should > bless this RTL experiment as the way to do Guile 2.2. (Thoughts or > objections welcome.) To that end, I think we need to start merging > wip-rtl into master. > > What I propose is that, if we agree, I start merging in trivial stuff. > When I get to something interesting that's not just a refactoring of > existing things, I'll submit that patch to the list. We have a few days > to look at it, we go through some review, and then we figure out how to > move forward -- usually merging some version of that patch. Then we > repeat. Sounds like a good plan. > Once the RTL branch is all merged in, we can start doing the same with > Noah's wip-rtl-cps branch. I’m unclear on what the safest or easiest approach is. My natural tendency would have led me to start by “just” rewriting the GLIL->assembly pass, and only then go with the fancy CPS compiler. But I gather that the CPS compiler may facilitate the conversion to assembly. What’s your take on this? > Then eventually some glorious day comes and we start using the CPS/RTL > toolchain, everything is working great and fast, and we start deleting > the old code. Looking forward to that day. :-) Ludo’.
