Daniel Hartwig <mand...@gmail.com> writes:
>> Also, question of style of Lisp code. It seems, that most common style
>> is `(action object arg1 ...)` and I find making object callable is more
>> elegant: `(object #:action arg1 ...)`. Is it discouraged?
> On some level both styles are functionally equivalent, although
> conceptually they are quite different. It is more or less a matter of
> taste. However, certain tasks are easier in one style or the other.
Of course. Essentially, it is question about object vs procedural style.
> Why do you find the second style more elegant?
I do not have to create a lot of foo-make-thing, foo-make-other
functions with, essentially, elisp or C naming conventions.
I still do not have feeling of functionality paradigm of Lisp, so I am
trying to use object-oriented paradigm. Probably, it is aganist spirit
of language.
--
Best regards, Dmitry Bogatov <kact...@gnu.org>,
Free Software supporter and netiquette guardian.
git clone git://gitorious.org/illusionoflife-read-only/rc-files.git
--depth 1
GPG: 54B7F00D
Html mail and proprietary format attachments are forwarded to /dev/null.
