On 15 April 2013 22:10, Daniel Llorens <daniel.llor...@bluewin.ch> wrote: > > Let's please agree on a behavior so we can start closing bugs. These are all > the objects accepted by the array interface. I've filled the table with some > ready-made choices that I think are at least internally consistent. > > ; -- > > (import (rnrs bytevectors)) > (define (every-two a) (make-shared-array a (lambda (i) (list (+ 1 (* 2 i)))) > 2)) > (define (offset1 a) (make-shared-array a (lambda (i) (list (1- i))) `(1 > ,(array-length a)))) > > ; [1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2013-04/msg00158.html > ; [2] stable-2.0 [e006d87] > ; [3] all array-type objects *are* arrays and support offsets, strides, etc. > ; [4] Common ground btw D. Hartwig and I (?), functionally r5rs vectors. > > ; -------------------------- [1] ------------ [2] --------- [3] ------ [4] >
Is column [4] intentionally missing from all but the first set? I was expecting it for atleast s8vector.
