Hi Noah, Noah Lavine <noah.b.lav...@gmail.com> writes: > Oh, sorry to email twice so soon, but I have an idea for making > par-map usable in more cases: add a keyword argument called > "block-size". Its value should be a positive integer, and the meaning > is to have each thread do block-size iterations.
IMO, we should avoid adding anything like this. It would be hard for callers to know what value to pass. I think it should be possible to make 'par-map' act sensibly and efficiently without this kind of help. > I tried to benchmark it, but got a segmentation fault. I think we > have plenty of work to do here. :-) Ouch. Can you please file a bug report with the full details? Regards, Mark