Mark H Weaver <m...@netris.org> skribis: > I think we should back out this change to SRFI-45. The only thing I > think we should keep is the addition of 'promise?' to the list of > exports (as is done in Racket).
[...] > Having thought more on this, I've come to agree with you. It's a > mistake to bend over backwards to remain compatible with SRFI-45. > It's more important to promote the best API we can come up with. > > Users wouldn't be able to rely on SRFI-45 having my proposed extension > anyway. I think we will abandon this proposed extension for Guile, and > leave SRFI-45 alone. Makes sense. What about adding (srfi srfi-45 gnu) with the extension? Ludo’.
