On 22 February 2013 04:59, <stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote: > I also suggest that for people writing compatability code that we have > a standard namespace for this. Let me suggest > > (compat name-of-scheme/lisp component ...) > e.g. > (compat racket match) > (compat racket for) > (compat racket struct) > > The idea is that we push code here that is useful for porting > the components that we are actually interesting to have in guile > like syntax-parse.
For those parts specific to racket, did you consider the (language racket ..) namespace, where an eventual language definition could be placed also?
