() Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com>
() Mon, 11 Feb 2013 09:20:55 +0100

     - Coordination cost (working with upstream on bugs/features)

   For ltdl, my instinct is "no".

   Just MHO :)

I imagine no one likes to hear the curmudgeon spew, but i feel it is my
duty (to GNU, Guile, and my fellow programmers) to trot out a reminder:
Live by the snub, die by the snub.

When someone applies the same instinct a few years down the line, the
libltdl reimpls (multiple, one per Guile release) will most likely
suffer from the same pronouncement.  It will be a lot of work for
everyone involved to return to the true upstream from the usurper, and
that work will not be done gladly.

-- 
Thien-Thi Nguyen ..................................... GPG key: 4C807502
.                  NB: ttn at glug dot org is not me                   .
.                 (and has not been since 2007 or so)                  .
.                        ACCEPT NO SUBSTITUTES                         .
........... please send technical questions to mailing lists ...........

Attachment: pgp926qk1JVhs.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to