On Mon 04 Feb 2013 03:07, Daniel Hartwig <mand...@gmail.com> writes: > On 31 January 2013 18:23, Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> wrote: >> Guile-Lib is intended as an accumulation place for pure-scheme Guile >> modules, allowing for people to cooperate integrating their generic >> Guile modules into a coherent library. Think "a down-scaled, >> limited-scope CPAN for Guile". > > Is guile-lib interested in receiving new code?
Dunno! I'm not sure. Now that we have the guildhall starting up, I would be inclined to say "no". Better a decentralized repo than a poorly maintained centralized repo. Do you think guile-lib should accept new code? Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
