Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> writes: > Here is where I think this code goes wrong: its correctness appears to > depend on the default port encoding. That is totally bogus. It was > written long before we had such a thing. > > Again, I think the default encoding for a string port should be one that > can represent all characters, and we should change this in master.
Yes, let's please fix this in master!
Mark
