On Wed 30 Jan 2013 22:18, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Can we discuss this one in the other thread, so my little brain and > mailbox don’t get confused? :-) > >> From 5512fe4f93e4e583ab538ae02dd98e5825252dc9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> >> Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 10:17:25 +0100 >> Subject: [PATCH] detect and consume byte-order marks for textual ports >> >> * libguile/ports.h: >> * libguile/ports.c (scm_consume_byte_order_mark): New procedure. >> >> * libguile/fports.c (scm_open_file): Call consume-byte-order-mark if we >> are opening a file in "r" mode. >> >> * libguile/read.c (scm_i_scan_for_encoding): Don't do anything about >> byte-order marks. >> >> * libguile/load.c (scm_primitive_load): Add a note about the duplicate >> encoding scan. >> >> * test-suite/tests/filesys.test: Add tests for UTF-8, UTF-16BE, and >> UTF-16LE BOM handling. > > Looks good to me.
It's terribly confusing, I'm sorry. I accidentally pushed this patch, then later pushed a reversion. Apologies for the mess. I think Mark's patches are the state of the art, off to review them now... Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
