On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe < stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 2. I was actually hesistant to call this srfi-72 because of trying to > do what it want > more than what it say's. A main trick to simulate the effect was to > introduce > a closure in the syntax at one point and therefore a choose the name > syntax-closure not knowing that there is an already a notion of > that in the wild > Oh - I thought you were referring to the existing syntactic-closures. I guess it's a plausible enough name to reuse coincidentally... Carry on then :) -- Alex
