Hi!

Noah Lavine <noah.b.lav...@gmail.com> skribis:

> Yes, I agree with everything you said here. I'm torn, because I think that
> in general having more portable Scheme code is good for everyone, and the
> RnRS standards are the best way to do that, so maybe we should just accept
> that the most recent 1 or 2 standards will always be loaded. But on the
> other hand, that doesn't mean that this particular module needs to use them.

I would like to be as optimistic as you are, but hey, R7RS purposefully
ignores or re-implements part of R6RS, which purposefully ignored
several SRFIs and implementations.

Conversely, Guile is a stable standard.  :-)

Ludo’.

Reply via email to