Hi! Noah Lavine <noah.b.lav...@gmail.com> skribis:
> Yes, I agree with everything you said here. I'm torn, because I think that > in general having more portable Scheme code is good for everyone, and the > RnRS standards are the best way to do that, so maybe we should just accept > that the most recent 1 or 2 standards will always be loaded. But on the > other hand, that doesn't mean that this particular module needs to use them. I would like to be as optimistic as you are, but hey, R7RS purposefully ignores or re-implements part of R6RS, which purposefully ignored several SRFIs and implementations. Conversely, Guile is a stable standard. :-) Ludo’.