On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 22:42 +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hi, > > Nala Ginrut <nalagin...@gmail.com> skribis: > > > Since (term ansi-color) code is small one, except for the comment, do we > > still need to ask him for integration? IMO, we just borrowed something > > interfaces from his code. > > Well yes, the color table itself is public data, not even copyrightable > per se. > > > Another question: > > I'll try to patch the colorized into 'pretty-print' now, but is it > > expected? Or just leave it as a independent module? Which is the proper > > way for the maintainer? > > Instead of patching (ice-9 pretty-print) specifically for your purposes, > perhaps you could instead make it more generally extensible, in a way > that would be useful for your use case but not only? >
I think (ice-9 colorized) is enough for colored-REPL purpose, of course, with Daniel's 'option-REPL-printer' patch. Besides, it'll provide other methods of coloring for the users. But the opinion to patch to 'pretty-print' also has a reason: if not, we'll keep another version of 'list/vector/array' printers. And the output indent may be different from 'pretty-print'. Some guys may think it's interesting, but others maybe not. hmm... > (I first need to look at the other threads on this topic...) > > Thanks, > Ludo’.
