On Sun, 2012-12-09 at 08:50 +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote: > On 9 December 2012 05:35, Ian Price <ianpric...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > Or, you could use the package manager I keep pimping :) > > Yes indeed, it works quite well. As does just adding such files to a > site- or user-local module path. > > > (os process) might be reasonable, since we are forever complaining about > > the popen module, but I don't see why we need (ansi term-color). > > Yes, agree. It is best to avoid adding some extra fluff (such as ansi > color module, colored output, etc.) to the core when appropriate. > Feature creep and all that is not a big win, makes guile generally > /less/ embeddable, and such. >
(ice-9 colorized) has already had the useful part compatible with (ansi term-color), you may checkout 'upstream' branch. So we don't have to add (ansi term-color). @ijp: yeah~what's the status about guildhall? Is there an official release? And the main site for it?
